The island

Letters raise opposing accounts of Denman bulk-water service

A Denman water-delivery operator says a local district ended his access to water, while the district’s stated reason is reported in a year-end account.

The Denman Firestarter · reporting 2019-01-10 · compiled 2026-10-01

Back issue. The Denman Firestarter did not exist on 2019-01-10. This edition was compiled on 2026-10-01 from the public record as it stood on 2019-01-10, and contains nothing dated after that day — no outcomes, no hindsight. It is a reconstruction of what was on the record at the time, not a document from the time. This edition.

Report. Facts and citations only. Where we argue a position we do it in Analysis, labelled. Our standards.

A letter in this week’s Grapevine says the Graham Lake Improvement District ended access to water used by Denman bulk-water delivery operator Marinus Blitterswyk, who wrote that the district told him it did not have a licence to sell water outside its district.^[1]

Blitterswyk wrote that the previous reason given for ending his permit was liability concerns, and said he had been unable to meet insurance and liability requirements he described as unrealistic.^[1]

In a separate year-end account, Anthony Gregson wrote that the district’s decision had followed a letter raising the prospect of bylaw enforcement and that the situation appeared to be moving toward temporary permits by year-end.^[1] The November Local Trust Committee minutes included here do not record the bulk-water dispute.^[2]

Spotted an error? corrections@denmanisland.co. We publish every correction.